The effect of sustained VDU and Non-VDU nearwork on visual acuity and refractive error in emmetropic primary schoolchildren
AbstractMyopic shift in refraction following a sustained period of near-work is well documented among adult visual display unit (VDU) users. This crossover study investigates the effect of VDU near-work on visual acuity and refractive status among 7-year-old children. Thirty emmetropic and low-hyperopic schoolchildren (refractive error: -0.25DS to +1.25DS, astigmatism ≤ 1.00DC and anisometropia ≤ 1.00D) participated in this study. All subjects (15 males and 15 females) were involved in two 2-hour near-work sessions (at 40 cm), one with and one without a VDU, which were carried out in random sequence on two separate days. Distance visual acuity (monocular/binocular) and subjective refractive error were measured before and immediately after both near-work sessions. MANCOVA analysis showed that VDU work produced a significant myopic shift, -0.10 ± 0.18 D (F1,54 = 5.17, p = 0.03) in distance refractive status. This myopic shift was not found after non-VDU work. There was no significant change in monocular (F1,54 = 0.03, p = 0.86) and binocular visual acuity (F1,54 = 0.22, p = 0.64) after near-work with or without VDU. Emmetropic and low-hyperopic schoolchildren are susceptible to VDU near-work after-effect. Sustained VDU near-work causes significant myopic shift in emmetropic and low-hyperopic 7-year-old children. However, the myopic shift is not accompanied by a reduction in visual acuity.
Gould, J.D., & Grischkowsky, N. (1984). Doing the same work with hard copy and with cathode-ray tube (CRT) computer terminals. Human Factor, 26, 323-337. doi:10.1177/001872088402600308
Haider, M., Kundi, M., & WeissenbÃ¶ck, M. (1980). Worker strain related to VDUs with differently coloured characters. In Ergonomic aspects of visual display terminals, Proceedings of the International Workshop, Milan (ed. E. Gradjean, E. Vigliani). London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Rey, P., & Meyer, J.J. (1980). Visual impairment and their objective correlates. In Ergonomic aspects of visual display terminals, Proceedings of the International Workshop, Milan (ed. E. Gradjean, E. Vigliani). London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Piccoli, B., Braga, D., Zambelli, P.L., & Bergamaschi, A. (1996). Viewing distance variation and related ophthalmological changes in office activities with and without VDUs. Ergonomics, 39, 719-728. doi:10.1080/00140139608964493
Cole, B.L., Maddocks, J.D., & Sharpe, K. (1996). Effect of VDUs on the eyes: Report of a 6-year epidemiological study. Optometry and Vision Sciece, 73, 512-528.
Nyman, K.G. (1988). Occupational near-work myopia. Acta Ophthalmologica, 185(supp), 167-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1988.tb02700.x
Yeow, P.T., & Taylor, S.P. (1989). Effects of short-term VDT usage on visual functions. Optometry and Vision Science, 66, 459-466.
Gratton, I., Piccoli, B., Saniboni, A., Meroni, M., & Grieco, A. (1990). Change in visual function and viewing distance during work with VDTs. Ergonomics, 33, 1433-1441. doi:10.1080/00140139008925344
Owens, D.A., & Wolf, K. (1987). Nearwork, visual fatigue, and variations of oculomotor tonus. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 28, 743-749.
Rosenfield, M., Chiu, N.N., Ciuffreda, K.J., & Duckman, R.H. (1994). Accommodative adaptation in children. Optometry and Vision Science, 71, 246-249.
Jones, L.A.J., Mitchell, G.L., Cotter, S.A,, Kleinstein, R.N., Manny, R.E., Mutti, D.O., Twelker, J.D., Sims, J.R., & Zadnik, K. for the CLEERE Stduy Groups. (2011). Visual activity before and after the onset of juvenile myopia. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 52, 1841-1850. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4997
Chen, A.H., Oâ€™Leary, D.J., & Howell, E.R. (2000). Near visual function in young children. Part: near point of convergence. Part II: amplitude of accommodation. Pat III: near heterophoria. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 20, 185-198. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2000.00498.x
Chung, K.M., & Chong, E. (2000). Near esophoria is associated with high myopia. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 83, 71-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2000.tb04895.x
Ciuffreda, K.J., & Vasudevan, B. (2008). Nearwork-induced transient myopia (NITM) and permanent myopia â€“ is there a link? Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 28, 103-114. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00550.x
Saw, S.M., Nieto, J., Katz, J., & Chew, S.J. (1999). Distance, lighting, and parental history in understanding nearwork in epidemiology studies of myopia. Optometry and Vision Science, 76, 355-361.
Jaschinski, W.K., & Toenies, U. (1988). Effect of a mental arithmetic task on dark focus of accommodation. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 8, 432-437. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1988.tb01181.x
Rosenfield, M., & Ciuffreda, K.J. (1994). Cognitive demand and transient nearwork-induced transient myopia. Optometry and Vision Science, 71, 381-385.
Bailey, I.L. (1988). Borishâ€™s clinical refraction (4th ed.). Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company.
Jaschinski, W., Heuer, H., & Kylian, H. (1998a). Preferred positioni of visual displays relative to the eyes: a field study of visual strain and individual differences. Ergonomics, 41, 1034-1049. doi:10.1080/001401398186586
Jaschinski, W., Koitcheva, V., & Heuer, H. (1998b). Fixation disparity, accommodation, dark vergence and dark focus during inclined gaze. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 18, 351-359. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.1998.00383.x
Jaschinski, W. (2002). The proximity-fixation-disparity curve and the preferred viewing distance at a visual display as an indicator of near vision fatigue. Optometry and Vision Science, 79, 158-169.
Takeda, T., Neveu, C., & Stark, L. (1992). Accommodation on downward gaze. Optometry and Vision Science, 69, 556-561.
Atchison, D.A., Claydon, C.A., & Irwan, S.E. (1994). Amplitude of accommodation for different head positions and different directions of eye gaze. Optometry and Vision Science, 71, 339-345.
Ebenholtz, S.M. (1985). Accommodation hysteresis: relation to resting focus. American Journal of Optometry Physiological Optics, 62, 755-762.
Chen, J.C., Schmid, K.L., & Brown, B. (2003). The autonomic control of accommodation and implication for human myopia development: a review. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 23, 401-422. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00135.x
Tucker, J., & Charman, W.N. (1987). Effect of target content at higher spatial frequencies on the accuracy of the accommodation response. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics,7, 137-142. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1987.tb01009.x
Taylor, J., Charman, W.N., Oâ€™Donnell, C., & Radhakrishnan, H. (2009). Effect of target spatial frequency on accommodative response in myopes and emmetropes. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-14. doi:10.1167/9.1.16
Strang, N.C., Day, M., Gray, L.S., & Seidel, D. (2011). Accommodation steps, target spatial frequency and refractive error. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 31, 444-454. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2011.00855.x
Day, M., Strang, N.C., Seidel, D., Gray, L.S., & Mallen, E.A.H. (2006). Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 26, 88-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2005.00347.x
Ukai, K., Tsuchiya, K., & Ishikawa, S. (1997). Induced pupillary hippus following near vision: increased occurrence in visual display unit workers. Ergonomics, 40, 1021-1211. doi: 10.1080/001401397187441
Rosenfield, M. (1998). Accommodation and myopia. In Myopia and nearwork (ed. M. Rosenfield, B. Gilmartin). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Randle, R.J. (1988). Responses of myopes to volitional control training of accommodation. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 8, 333-340. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1988.tb01063.x
Iwasaki, T., Tawara, A., & Miyake, N. (2005). Reduction of asthenopia related to accommodative relaxation by means of far point stimuli. Acta Ophthalmologica 83, 81-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2005.00352.x